Forward four All, the nonprofit trying to orchestrate an unholy land snatch between Anniston and Oxford, has a spokesperson: Charles Turner.
He wrote a legislative bill that seeks to de-annex almost 10,000 Anniston residents — all of Ward four and slivers of other neighborhoods — and slide them into Oxford. As he informed The Star, he is the face of the nonprofit whose members are concerned that “so long as we’re in Anniston, we received’t get the whole charge while we promote our houses” due to lengthy-festering problems with the town’s majority-black public schools and poverty quotes.
Anniston’s Ward 4 is floor 0 of this land take hold of. It needs a spokesperson to guard it against deannexation or shepherd it into Oxford.
It ought to be Millie Harris.
She is Ward Four’s City Council member. She needs to dominate these discussions — now not Mayor Jack Draper, and in reality, not Ward Three Councilman Ben Little, who commonly dominates everything. Yet, while Draper last week discussed a probable City Council decision against forwarding four All’s the notion — a decision Draper assumed might receive unanimous council guide — that is what Harris informed her council colleagues:
“I represent all of Ward 4. This isn’t always about me; I listen to each aspect. I understand your frustration, and I’m in that position. But I will abstain from vote casting on any of this because I represent all the humans” in Ward 4.
Granted, Harris is in a horrible bind. However, that’s politics; it’s similarly cutthroat and rewarding; she signed up for this. She’s a Ward 4 resident with deep ties to Anniston’s over-the-mountain neighborhoods. And she’s getting hammered through Ward 4 residents who both believe Turner’s notion or those like me who think it would be a demise sentence for Anniston’s fragile fire-and-police pension fund, its future financial development efforts, and its popularity.
Anniston can’t resist the visibility of center- and high-income white citizens fleeing to a majority-white neighboring city and far from its majority-black colleges and lower-profit neighborhoods. Those optics might be debilitating.
Harris wasn’t elected to be Ward Four’s stenographer and help measures completely primarily based on citizens’ wishes. Politics isn’t polling. She becomes elected to symbolize Ward Four’s excellent pastimes, something they’ll be, even supposing it earns her biting complaint. She turned into elected to steer. In a council paintings consultation, she said she could abstain from vote casting on a deannexation decision centering on her ward because she heard “both facets of it” change into unfortunate optics and unwise politics.
I changed into shock, as had been others. Credit Harris, but I feel bothered when you abandon that stance. “Needless to say, this week has been a fairly traumatic time to reflect,” she advised me Friday afternoon, “with my thoughts evolving from serving the needs of all Ward four citizens, thus abstaining from balloting to one among concluding that the pleasant interest of our cherished town is to oppose deannexation thru joining our council in a unanimous vote for a decision to oppose.”
Now, Anniston’s City Council can act as one. Council participants can maintain hands in team spirit and say what they have to—that Forward Four All’s suggestion endangers the city’s destiny, doesn’t empower or improve Anniston’s colleges, and is based, in large part, on enhancing the personal real property holdings of a secretive group of mostly white center- and high-profit Annistonians.
At the subsequent City Council assembly, Harris should issue Forward Four All an undertaking: Meet us in Wards 2 and 3, where poverty isn’t unusual and wishes are extraordinary. Please work with us to improve housing alternatives andand find answers that lower unemployment. Use your apparent sway with state Sen. Del Marsh, R-Anniston, to unite, now not divide. Drive over the mountain to Woodstock Avenue and join us as mentors to Anniston High School students. Don’t run away. Don’t surrender. Don’t snort at the optimism many Annistonians nonetheless keep.
And I’d encompass this addendum:
Don’t tell Anniston’s remnants that splitting the metropolis’s population almost in half, and for this reason, enhancing the city’s racial divide, is better for all ultimately — or that it’s the handiest logical course. Don’t tell Anniston’s remnants that law main to dissolving Anniston’s faculties might enhance the one’s college students because they’d get to attend racially various Calhoun County colleges. And don’t tell Anniston’s remnants that reinvigorating asset values in Golden Springs through an Oxford escape will routinely breed economic trends and process opportunities for the city’s minority neighborhoods. If Wards 2 and 3 need assistance, move there and assist us in assisting them.
Oh, and one extra: Hold agenda meetings in the town’s black neighborhoods and explain how Forward 4 All surely is ahead for all. I didn’t ask Harris. However, I guess she’d help with that, too. “I’ve by no means seen a more divisive issue as this one,” she said.
