Twenty-nine seats in Jadavpur University’s mechanical engineering department and 23 in Calcutta University’s jute and fiber technology department have remained vacant these 12 months.
Over the past two years, the emptiness trend has led education experts to advise universities to consider rationalizing seats. This could involve reducing the number of streams in publications with much less demand and increasing consumption in more famous streams.
Metro reported on Sunday that over 260 engineering seats have remained vacant at Jadavpur University this year. The number has gone up within the past fortnight as many college students have opted for different institutes.
Veteran teachers said there was a time when students might never have considered quitting JU, but that notion appears to have changed.
Officials at the two universities stated they might have the motives for the seats closing vacant.
Of the 68 seats that have remained vacant throughout nine streams in CU’s BTech program, jute and fiber generation debts for the very best wide variety. At JU, mechanical engineering had the very best variety of vacant seats across 16 disciplines.
Partha Pratim Das, a professor of laptop technology and engineering at IIT Kharagpur, said the colleges have to verify whether there has been a desire to rationalize seats.
“If a particular field is found to have vacancies in successive years due to loss of demand inside the process market, the University can always discover the opportunity of slashing seats in that move and proportionately growing seats in a subject with more call for. This allows in containing the problem of seats closing vacant in huge numbers,” Das stated.
A legit at IIT Kharagpur started the institute had numerous years in the past reduced seats in mining engineering as there were few takers.
A JU instructor said the University should investigate the possibility of reducing the seats in mechanical engineering and growing consumption in computer technology and engineering, electronics, and telecommunication engineering instead because the demand for core engineering courses has waned over the last few years due to the task crunch.
Anupam Basu, the director of NIT Durgapur, said Calcutta University should consider slashing seats in the jute and fiber era program. “It has the maximum variety of seats, but the path appears to have misplaced favor with college students,” he stated.
When asked about the need for rationalizing seats, JU Pro-VC Chiranjib Bhattacharjee stated, “We need to look at the motives for the vacancies before taking any decision.”
The two universities might take behavior counseling periods to fill the vacancies. This monthly complete life has been ruled via one simple query, “How did all of this start”? By all of this, I, of course, am referring to our entire universe. I have pondered this question for over 25 years, and I am 31 years old now. Science has always been my favorite subject. After I was developing. After school, I spent hours in excessive college discussing my mind and theories with my science instructors. I continued to accomplish that even when I attended the University. I learned the three most famous and time-honored theories of the day. The most popular of which is the Big Bang Theory. The simplest credit score I am inclined to give the Big Bang Theory is that it’s far feasible but implausible it can be. What maintains the Big Bang Theory alive is that there appears to be scientifically demonstrated evidence that points to it as the only clarification. I could argue that every one of the very same pieces of evidence that helped the Big Bang could also support different hypotheses. The one sticking factor for me is the “Before Period.” What existed earlier than the singularity exploded? Where did all of that strength come from? After all, we are speaking about all of the power contained inside all of the depend within the universe and all of the free power traversing this expanse. The Oscillating Universe Theory is quality, but it suffers the identical hassle, assuming there ever truly becomes a starting. If the universe has continually existed, then it’s miles an attainable idea. The identical holds authentic for the Steady State Universe Theory. The notion is that the universe has constantly existed and will always exist as it has. The handiest change in this model is that the distances between galaxies and gadgets will increase with the new matter being created. The universe keeps appearing identical in all guidelines. The big hassle with this principle is that we realize the universe is not unchanging. It is increasing and does exchange. We realize that stars explode, exhaust their fuel, fade away, or weigh themselves down into a singularity. This universe we stay in is a dynamic vicinity. Galaxies collide, sun structures collide, planets and moons, and an entire host of objects can spoil into one another at any second. All of it is dancing to the gravitational music of the heavens. All of these factors contribute to something but a regular country.
What I am about to advocate in this paper is an idea I have dwelled upon for years. It is an idea that I believe in and has helped me better understand our universe. It also goes past the sticking point of “What got here before.” In my opinion, there are the simplest modern-day theories that make sense. There is my theory of the not-anything universe and the theory of God. No, be counted on how tough I rack my mind. I can not come to another end. Either my principle is accurate, the correct concept has no longer been written, or God is answerable for the whole lot. These were the selections I gave myself; for now, I will stick with my conclusions. My intention now could be to proportion my theory with the arena, and I hope it is great. I agree that this theory ties all the loose ends of life together. I additionally believe that it is every bit as top because of the Big Bang Theory. With a clear knowledge of our beginnings, we can gain full insight into the inner workings of our reality. I would also like to add that I talk over my speculation as a principle because I agree with most, if now not all, of the evidence in aid of the Big Bang can also aid my speculation.
The Nothing Universe
We are all familiar with our human idea of not anything. When a bottle is empty, we say, “Nothing is in it.” We know that this isn’t sincerely the case. We relate that what we thought should be inside the bottle is no longer there. The boat leaves contain a vacuum so that nothing is inside the bottle. A vacuum is an entire absence of dependence. This would be an excellent vacuum. Space isn’t an excellent vacuum, and it’s difficult to mention if a great vacuum may even exist. Regardless, a vacuum is the true idea, not anything. However, it isn’t the authentic shape of nothing. I am pronouncing that our idea of not anything and the true shape of not anything is different. The proper country of not anything is neutrality.
Stability among fees in a superbly organized atom. I have named this ideal atom the Nothing Atom. This nothing atom comprises count and anti-remember debris joined together and separated through neutrons. The nothing atom includes the proton, the neutron, the electron, and anti-depend on opposite numbers. They are all locked together and kept from destroying each other by bsing neutrons. I do not realize the precise association of those particles on this perfect atom, but this is inappropriate. All that is critical is the idea that they’re all locked together in this one best, Nothing Atom. The electron and the positron no longer annihilate each other because they occupy specific orbital lobes. Again, I no longer understand this atom’s precise association, only that it existed. Whatever the perfect arrangement, this perfectly neutral Nothing Atom is the handiest issue inside the pre-universe and is composed of infinity. No loose space existed between those atoms. There became no movement and, therefore, no time; however, we will use the concept of infinity to offer us an idea of the kingdom of the universe up till the factor of the occasion.
